Center for Food Safety | Policy Comments | | Comments to FDA from the National Organic Coalition opposing the introduction of G

November 19th, 2010

Comments to FDA from the National Organic Coalition opposing the introduction of GE salmon and urging mandatory labeling should the fish be approved.

View the PDF

November 18th, 2010

| Nanotechnology

Formal request calling on EPA to investigate issue related to oversight of nano-copper pesticides.

View the PDF

November 18th, 2010

| GE Fish

Letter from U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) to FDA urging the agency to properly vet the unique issues and concerns raised by GE fish in a more transparent manner

View the PDF

November 17th, 2010

| GE Fish

Comments from the American Anti-Vivisection Society to FDA on labeling and approval of genetically engineered salmon

View the PDF

November 17th, 2010

| GE Fish

Comments from the Franciscan Action Network to FDA on the approval and labeling of GE salmon

View the PDF

November 17th, 2010

| GE Fish

Comments from the National Cooperative Grocers Association to FDA on the approval and labeling of GE salmon

View the PDF

November 10th, 2010

| GE Fish

Comments to FDA from the MaryKnoll Office for Global Concerns opposing the introduction of GE salmon, and urging mandatory labeling should the fish be approved.

View the PDF

November 8th, 2010

| GE Fish

12 executive officers of some of the nation's largest environmental organizations request that the Food and Drug Administration conduct a thorough Environmental Impact Statement before deciding whether to approve the first ever genetically engineered animal for food

View the PDF

October 28th, 2010

| GE Fish

Letter from the City of Tenakee Springs, Alaska, supporting the City of Petersburg's resolution opposing GE salmon; sent to the FDA.

View the PDF

October 28th, 2010

| GE Fish

Resolution adopted by the Gustavus City Council (Gustavus, Alaska) expressing opposition to allowing AquaBounty to market genetically engineered salmon

View the PDF

October 20th, 2010

| GE Fish

Comments to FDA from Kruzof Fisheries, Inc. (Alaska) urging mandatory labeling of GE salmon should the fish be aproved for commercialization.

View the PDF

October 12th, 2010

| Organic & Beyond

| Nanotechnology

CFS Comments on National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) Materials Committee: Proposal from Materials Committee to the NOSB on Nanotechnology and Nanomaterials for discussion October 25-28, 2010.

View the PDF

October 11th, 2010

| GE Fish

Resolution adopted by the City of Petersburg, Alaska opposing an application from AquaBounty Technologies, Inc to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to approve and market genetically engineered Atlantic salmon in the United States

View the PDF

October 7th, 2010

| GE Fish

Letter from Aleutians East Bourough to Senator Murkowski, Senator Begich and Representative Young thanking them for their opposition to GE salmon

View the PDF

October 6th, 2010

| GE Fish

Comments from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conservation Genetics Community of Practice (COP) to the FDA's Veterinary Medicine Advisory Committee on GE salmon approval

View the PDF

September 30th, 2010

| GE Fish

Comments from Gregory Moyer, PhD, Regional Geneticist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to FDA's Veterinary Medicine Advisory Committee on GE salmon approval

View the PDF

JOIN

Protecting Our Food, Farms & Environment

Policy Comments